Pursuing National Security by Iran is Not Equal to Being Paranoid about the USA

نویسندگان

چکیده

In most countries of the world where there is a strong western influence, has been persistent narrative that Iran paranoid about United States America. It will not spare any grain to ensure destruction mighty American nation. But according leaders Iran, their actions are safeguarding country national security interest. Yet, have limited studies respond whether USA or if it all security. Hence this study sought illustrate dangers appeasing when your policies in contract. The selected few and scenarios: Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq-Iran war, Axil Evil phrase, Iraq, Syria for illustration. shown relent pursue its interest against those opposing it, notwithstanding consequences on recipients. This trend continue manifest unforeseeable, thereby putting danger befell other nations who had opposed USA. Based findings, concludes but concerned with preserving interests.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

NL is not equal to NP and NP is not equal to EXPTIME

In this paper we show that the quantified Boolean formula problem can be solved in polynomial time by an alternating Turing machine with 2 alternations, if in Boolean formula there exist no more than order of logarithm clauses in which all variables with the existential quantifier.

متن کامل

P is not equal to NP by Modus Tollens

An artificially designed Turing Machine algorithm Mo generates the instances of the satisfiability problem, and check their satisfiability. Under the assumption P = NP , we show that Mo has a certain property, which, without the assumption, Mo does not have. This leads to P 6= NP by

متن کامل

P is not equal to NP

SAT is not in P is proved, in a first-order theory, with a new single finite axiom of Turing’s theory of computing. So, P is not equal to NP.

متن کامل

P is not equal to NP

A new axiom of Turing’s theory of computing is used to prove that SAT is not in P. Thus, P is not equal to NP, follows directly. A computeroriented version verifies the results, elsewhere, using a theorem-prover.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Traektoriâ nauki

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['2413-9009']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.68-6